October 14, 2022
I think I’ll never see a campaign poster as lovely as a saguaro,
Indeed, unless these posters fall, I’ll never see a saguaro at all-o.
Campaign posters. They are everywhere this political season. As a result of these posters I suffer from what I call Perceived Party Facial Recognition (PPFR) and I am unable to see the issues through this obfuscating forest of benign faces. Well, you know what they say in campaign circles: perception is deception.
Now, about that deception:
These vanity posters tell us nothing about the candidates. For example, Teresa Martinez (R), is running for Arizona House. Going by her 8,000 headshots on 2,000 street corners, one would never guess she’s a Gosar/Finchem clone who doesn’t believe a woman has the right to choose when to become a mother. Meanwhile her ubiquitous cardboard replicas are everywhere. But what does Martinez stand for if not — more Republican hypocrisy! — her own photographic reproductive rights?
In the future, I suggest fewer cardboard headshots and more political disclosure, please. Seeking that disclosure, I submit three questions to all Arizona candidates.
Gun legislation. Is the candidate for or against assault-style weapons in Arizona or does the candidate take a more nuanced Ted Cruz approach to gun violence (i.e. fewer doors in elementary schools)?
Women’s reproductive rights. Should reproductive experts Blake Masters and Lindsey Graham decide what’s legal and what’s not?
Voting rights. Should Arizona voters — including single moms who cannot afford to take off work on election day — be allowed to cast ballots by mail?
Three questions, candidates. Put your answers on your posters next time. Complimentary headshots optional.