There’s a moment in the TV show “The West Wing” that comes to mind occasionally. The chief of staff brazenly admonishes the president over his policies. He tells him that he’s been holding back because he’s afraid to lose his next election. And that could describe nearly every politician I can think of. If you need an example, think of the 43 Republican senators who recently voted against convicting Donald Trump. Surely some of them must know that their vote was wrong, but it didn’t matter because a vote against their “messiah” was a vote to make this term their last. Even the most liberal of liberals know that they can afford to take the stances they do because their constituents agree with those stances. But doing what’s right even if you know it may cost you shouldn’t be as rare as it is.
Consider Rep. Jeannette Rankin, the first female congressperson. She firmly believed that war should not be the solution to our problems. So much so that she was the only representative to vote against entering into war with Japan. Whether you agree with her views or not, no one can dispute that she had real guts. Her vote effectively ended her political career, but she didn’t compromise her morals. We shouldn’t either.
We have all seen videos of Senate Republicans — Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham and others pretending to stand on “principle” in 2016 as they denied a hearing for Obama’s Supreme Court nominee and defended the idea that the American people should be given the opportunity to decide a Supreme Court appointment that occurred during an election year.
The same senators pretend to stand on “principle” again as they reverse their 2016 rule at this point in this election year. Disregarding the majority will of the American people and his own 2016 rule, Mitch McConnell allows Trump a Supreme Court nomination and pushes to fill the vacant seat left by Ruth Bader Ginsburg weeks before an election. Neither the rights of the next president or of the American people matter when Republicans see a way to grab more power. To Republican “alternate facts” in the executive branch, we can now add “honorable hypocrisy” in the Republican Senate.
In response, Democrats threaten to increase the number of judges on the court to provide balance or a liberal court. Republicans call this “packing the court” and accuse Democrats of an abuse of power that will undermine the court’s legitimacy.
Isn’t preventing a hearing on a presidential nominee as was done with Obama, or approving a hearing of a nominee against the will of the American people and their own 2016 rule just before an election, just another way to “pack the court”? Isn’t this an abuse of power that will undermine not only the court’s legitimacy but the credibility of the presidency and the Senate as well? On all counts — you bet it is.
I read the Dispatch column Saturday morning from Rep. T.J. Shope about electric vehicles. I can’t help but wonder if any of our current LD8 state legislators own one?
I’m sure I’ve seen Frank Pratt driving around town in a non-electric SUV (he has Pratt on his license plate). I’m not sure what Shope or Cook drive. It is also interesting to note that even though the price of EVs has been coming down, the Lucid vehicle will be a high-end luxury car, not affordable for the average consumer. I am very glad Lucid is coming to the area but their cars will be priced out of reach for most working Arizona families. Perhaps Shope is just out of touch on the reality of Arizona economics! I do want to mention that I have seen state representative candidate for LD8 Sharon Girard driving around the local area for months in her electric vehicle: Model 3 Tesla (the most reasonably priced model). I have also heard Ms. Girard speak at forums and she is a supporter of clean and renewable energy, especially solar and more public transportation for our area, including a rapid train system from Phoenix to Tucson. Additionally, her legislative platform calls for eliminating single-use plastic bags. We can go to brown paper bags during the pandemic, which are much more environmentally friendly. I believe it is important that our representatives are role models for all of us. They should walk the walk and talk the talk.
Usually, I can barely stomach a piece written by Cal Thomas. Today's piece, "Slanting of COVID-19 coverage," is an exception. Mr. Thomas follows the lead of Trump by castigating the media for their slanted coverage, using various quotes from Nicolle Wallace, David Brooks, Thomas Friedman and Joe Scarborough as examples. The thing is, those quotes all ring true in exposing Trump and his Republican sycophants for the inept, unfit bunch they are. So, I encourage Mr. Thomas to keep at it with the quotes. Keep showing the disaster that is Trump and the Republican Party. I love it!
To analyze further, let’s look at other articles in today's Dispatch: 1) Problems with the small business loan program preventing funds from getting to the true small businesses that need them. 2) The terrible treatment nurses received, here in Arizona, from re-open protesters egged on by Trump's "Liberate" tweets. 3) The response from residents on the border to continued construction on the wall, despite concerns about workers and Border Patrol coming into their small, isolated communities and possibly bringing the virus with them. 4) Health care facilities, in San Diego, that had planned to hire foreign nurses to deal with a shortage and now can't, due to his immigration ban. 5) The dangerous nature of Trump's "medical statements" in general.
I guess from all of this I should determine that the conservative-leaning Dispatch is slanting their coverage as well? Nope. There’s just too much out there to be ignored.
You have an opinion - share it. All of our members are encouraged to write letters to the editor of our hometown newspaper and share your thoughts. You could help change the world.